<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conney Safety Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conneyblog.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conneyblog.com</link>
	<description>Safety Products</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Guns in the Workplace: Safety Hazard?</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/guns-in-the-workplace-safety-hazard</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/guns-in-the-workplace-safety-hazard#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Puffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Workplace Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another state will soon allow workers to keep guns in their vehicles’ locked trunks and glove compartments in companies’ parking lots.

In an opinion piece in the Northwest Indiana Times, lawyer James Jorgensen says the new law could adversely affect employers and the workplace.



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a title="Permanent Link: Guns in the workplace: Safety hazard?" href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/guns-in-the-workplace-safety-hazard/" target="_blank">Guns in the workplace: Safety hazard?</a></strong></p>
<p>March 30, 2010 by Fred Hosier</p>
<p>Another state will soon allow workers to keep guns in their vehicles’ locked trunks and glove compartments in companies’ parking lots.</p>
<p>Indiana’s new law will take effect July 1, 2010.</p>
<p>In an <a title="NWI Times" href="http://nwitimes.com/business/columnists/james-jorgensen/article_861fc9ef-4dae-5996-957b-c08595eb4cfd.html" target="_blank">opinion piece</a> in the <em>Northwest Indiana Times</em>, lawyer James Jorgensen says the new law could adversely affect employers and the workplace.</p>
<p>He points to Bureau of Labor Statistics. In 2007, there were 16,840 nonfatal assaults and violent acts in the workplace. The same year, 11% of workplace fatalities were homicides. Homicide has been one of the top four causes of workplace deaths since 1992.</p>
<p>Jorgensen points out, correctly, that OSHA considers workplace violence as an occupational hazard.</p>
<p>And even though OSHA doesn’t have a workplace violence standard, the agency can invoke the General Duty Clause to fine employers for workplace violence that causes injury or death.</p>
<p>Jorgensen’s advice: Companies need to adopt workplace violence policies with clear statements of consequences for violations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/guns-in-the-workplace-safety-hazard/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New MSA Altair 4X Monitor with 4 Year Sensor Life</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/new-products/new-msa-altair-4x-monitor-with-4-year-sensor-life</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/new-products/new-msa-altair-4x-monitor-with-4-year-sensor-life#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Link</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new MSA Altair 4X monitor incorporates sensor technology that typically extends the sensor life to four years. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSA now has a portable gas monitor with a sensor life greater than four years. The new MSA Altair 4X monitor incorporates sensor technology that typically extends the sensor life to four years.  Some of the features include:  MotionAlert which will alert should the user become inactive for 30 seconds, glow-in-dark housing, Galaxy Compatible and three year warranty.  Learn much more about the Altair 4X at <a href="http://www.msanet.com/ALTAIR4X/" target="_blank">msanet.com</a> . Talk with the <a href="mailto:safetysupport@conney.com">Conney Safety Support team</a> for information on ordering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/new-products/new-msa-altair-4x-monitor-with-4-year-sensor-life/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foundations of Hand Protection</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/foundations-of-hand-protection</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/foundations-of-hand-protection#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tesmer, CSP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Safety Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article talks about some strong approaches to helping an employer keep hand injuries to a minimum. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next time someone at your facility experiences a destructive hand injury, advise all department managers of the status of the injury and the costs associated. Tie it to their bonus pay.  This article talks about some strong approaches to helping an employer keep hand injuries to a minimum. </p>
<p>All industries have hand/finger injuries. From heavy machinery production to bakeries to general office work, one look at your yearly injury log will reveal hand injuries. Take a deep breath and start trying to work through this issue.  Start from the posture that you will be reducing both the number of injuries and the severity of those injuries.</p>
<p><a href="http://ohsonline.com/Articles/2010/08/01/Foundations-of-Hand-Protection.aspx" target="_blank">http://ohsonline.com/Articles/2010/08/01/Foundations-of-Hand-Protection.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/foundations-of-hand-protection/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Safety Surprises and Suggestions</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/home-safety-surprises-and-suggestions</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/home-safety-surprises-and-suggestions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Vogel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Safety Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any time of year can be the right time to take a look around your home and find ways to make it safer for you and your family.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any time of year can be the right time to take a look around your home and find ways to make it safer for you and your family.</p>
<p>For example, simple home maintenance can avert a number of potential problems. Cleaning lint filters in the clothes dryer before every load and cleaning the dryer vent line each year can prevent dryer fires. Shockingly, there are more than 15,000 dryer-related fires each year.</p>
<p>Placing a barbecue grill too close to the house can be another way to cook up accidents. It&#8217;s estimated that 6,500 barbecue grill fires cause as much as $27 million in property losses each year.</p>
<p>Some injuries can be prevented by just choosing a different tool for a difficult task. Consider using a can opener instead of a kitchen knife the next time you open those frustrating anti-theft plastic clamshell packages. And did you know that a sharp knife is safer than a dull knife? A dull blade leads to slips.</p>
<p>Did you know that:</p>
<ul>
<li>86,000 people fall each year because of their pets?</li>
<li>Power-mower injuries cause 80,000 hospital visits each year?</li>
<li>Poison ivy is getting more potent and harder to identify?</li>
<li>More people are injured using hand tools than power tools?</li>
</ul>
<p>Many of these injuries can be prevented with simple fixes that take just moments but rarely make it to our to-do lists.</p>
<p>Consider these small tasks:</p>
<ul>
<li>Moving the grill 10 feet from the house or shrubs can help protect you from a larger fire if the grill tips or the fire flares.</li>
<li>Feeding the cat before making dinner can stop it from milling around the kitchen when you&#8217;re cooking. A baby gate can keep the dog out of the kitchen altogether.</li>
<li>Most mower injuries are caused by stones or other things kicked out by mower blades moving at high speed. Clearing the yard of debris before mowing can help.</li>
<li>Can&#8217;t recognize poison ivy? The oil that causes people to react to poison ivy won&#8217;t penetrate long sleeves and pants or vinyl work gloves.</li>
</ul>
<p>By drawing attention to home-safety risks that are easy to overlook but not too hard to prevent,  you will have a safer home all year round.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.napsnet.com/" target="_blank"><em>This article is provided courtesy of the North American Precis Syndicate.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/home-safety-surprises-and-suggestions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OSHA Forum to ID HAZ Chemicals Most in Need of Agency Action</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/1735</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/1735#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Muehlenkamp, CSP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Safety Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Many of our permissible exposure limits are based on 1950s-era science that we now realize is inadequate to protect workers in 21st century workplaces."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During its first two years of existence, OSHA established approximately 400 permissible exposure limits (PELs) for hazardous chemicals based on then-existing national consensus or federal standards. Since then, OSHA has been able to develop more protective regulations for only 29 chemicals, while the majority of OSHA PELs have remained unchanged.</p>
<p>&#8220;Many of our permissible exposure limits are based on 1950s-era science that we now realize is inadequate to protect workers in 21st century workplaces,&#8221; said Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA David Michaels. &#8220;We must assure the protection of workers currently exposed to well-recognized chemical hazards for which we have an inadequate PEL or no PEL at all. I am hopeful that this forum will assist us in achieving that goal by helping us to identify those chemicals on which we should be focusing our efforts.&#8221;</p>
<p>The forum will allow stakeholders to identify harmful chemicals and explain why OSHA should focus on these chemicals in developing long- and short-term solutions for reducing workers&#8217; exposure.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Ref</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&amp;p_id=18174" target="_blank">http://osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&amp;p_id=18174</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/1735/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OSHA’s Aggressive Enforcement Stance</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/osha%e2%80%99s-aggressive-enforcement-stance</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/osha%e2%80%99s-aggressive-enforcement-stance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Puffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Workplace Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mantra of this OSHA Administration is “The Sheriff is Back”. Many changes in policy and enforcement have taken place already with an aggressive path for the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mantra of this OSHA Administration is “The Sheriff is Back”. Many changes in policy and enforcement have taken place already with an aggressive path for the future. OSHA is putting industries and employers on notice in high hazard industries and for high hazard tasks. Two policies are being implemented to deter violation of OSHA standards will affect the employers financially. They are Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP) and Administrative Penalty Increase.</p>
<p><strong>Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP)</strong><br />
One policy change is OSHA&#8217;s <a href="http://wmc.informz.net/admin31/content/l.asp?u=1011853166&amp;m=959423&amp;s=10470&amp;p=6&amp;l=https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=DIRECTIVES&amp;p_id=4503" target="_blank">Severe Violator Enforcement Program</a> (SVEP), which concentrates resources on inspecting employers who have demonstrated indifference to their OSH Act obligations by committing willful, repeated, or failure-to-abate violations. Enforcement actions for severe violator cases include mandatory follow-up inspections, increased company/corporate awareness of OSHA enforcement, corporate-wide agreements, where appropriate, enhanced settlement provisions, and federal court enforcement under Section 11(b) of the OSH Act. In addition, this Instruction provides for nationwide referral procedures, which includes OSHA&#8217;s State Plan States.</p>
<p><a href="http://wmc.informz.net/admin31/content/l.asp?u=1011853166&amp;m=959423&amp;s=10470&amp;p=6&amp;l=http://wmc.informz.net/wmc/data/images/documents/oshaarticle_august2010_svepgraphic.doc" target="_blank">Click here</a> to view a graphic that depicts whether or not a case would qualify for SVEP.<br />
<strong><br />
OSHA Administrative Penalty Information Bulletin</strong><br />
The other policy change is the <a href="http://wmc.informz.net/admin31/content/l.asp?u=1011853166&amp;m=959423&amp;s=10470&amp;p=6&amp;l=https://www.osha.gov/dep/administrative-penalty.html" target="_blank">overall increase in penalties and calculation procedure</a> for all inspections. OSHA is implementing several changes to its administrative penalty calculation system. Many of the agency&#8217;s current penalty adjustment factors have been in place since the early 1970&#8242;s, resulting in penalties which are often too low to have an adequate deterrent effect. Administrative penalty adjustments will therefore be made to several factors which impact the final penalty issued to employers. These factors include:</p>
<p>1.    History Reduction (Time frame increased from 3 to 5 years)<br />
2.    History Increase  (Possible increase of 10 %, No History if cited within the past 5 years)<br />
3.    Repeat Violations (Time frame increased from 3 to 5 years)<br />
4.    Severe Violator Enforcement Program (See above)<br />
5.    Gravity-Based Penalty (see chart below)<br />
6.    Size Reduction (10 – 20 % decrease from the past policy)<br />
7.    Good Faith (current policy retained with minor exceptions)<br />
8.    Minimum Penalties (Minimum of $500 for Serious and $250 for posting requirement)<br />
9.    Additional Administrative Modifications to the Penalty Calculation Policy</p>
<p><strong><em>Gravity-Based Penalty: Before Credits OR Increases Applied<br />
Current</em></strong><em>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;&gt; <strong>New</strong></em><br />
High/Greater:  $5,000 or $7,000&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;&gt; $7,000<br />
Medium/Greater:  $3,500&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;&gt; $6,000<br />
Low/Greater:  $2,500&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&gt; $5,000<br />
High/Lesser:  $2,500&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&gt; $5,000<br />
Medium/Lesser:  $2,000&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&gt; $4,000<br />
Low/Lesser:  $1,500&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;&gt; $3,000</p>
<p>Employers need to be aware of the current <a href="http://wmc.informz.net/admin31/content/l.asp?u=1011853166&amp;m=959423&amp;s=10470&amp;p=6&amp;l=http://www.osha.gov" target="_blank">OSHA policies</a>. The agency will be targeting industries that have high fatality, injury and illness rates. Be aware of the list of “high emphasis hazards” and address the hazards before it leads to the Severe Violator Enforcement Program and/or higher penalties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/osha%e2%80%99s-aggressive-enforcement-stance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Training for Non-English Speaking Workers</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/training-for-non-english-speaking-workers</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/training-for-non-english-speaking-workers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Link</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Safety Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across a great article on workplace training for Latino and other non-english speaking workers.  The article outlines the OSHA requirement that all employees need training in an understandable format.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran across a great <a href="http://www.palletenterprise.com/articledatabase/view.asp?articleID=3175" target="_blank">article </a>on workplace training for Latino and other non-english speaking workers. The article outlines the <a href="http://www.osha.gov/" target="_blank">OSHA</a> requirement that all employees need training in an understandable format. For example, Latino workers need to receive training in Spanish.  Some other examples that might not be so apparent are providing adequate training to illiterate employees, and also providing training at an appropriate vocabulary level. </p>
<p>An important stipulation pointed out in the article is that “having the information around employees is not the same as providing training.” In other words, you can’t expect an employee to learn valuable workplace skills with passive training, such as providing a manual and telling the employee to read it.  As an employer, it is your responsibility to adequately train employees which includes determining what “adequate training” entails and how to effectively pass that information on to every employee.  Talk with the <a href="mailto:safetysupport@conney.com">Conney Safety Support team</a> for more information on workplace training or for training solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/workplace-compliance/training-for-non-english-speaking-workers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OSHA to Stakeholders: Which PELs Should Be Updated First?</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/osha-to-stakeholders-which-pels-should-be-updated-first</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/osha-to-stakeholders-which-pels-should-be-updated-first#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tesmer, CSP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Safety Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, OSHA announced it is seeking input from stakeholders on which chemicals should receive priority for updating permissible exposure limits (PELs).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week <a href="http://www.osha.gov" target="_blank">OSHA </a>announced it is seeking input from stakeholders on which chemicals should receive priority for updating permissible exposure limits (PELs).  These levels are critical for helping to keep employees safe from various chemical exposures in the workplace.  If air testing shows your facility is over the limit, a company would need to come up with methods (e.g. better exhaust ventilation, re-engineering the process) to lower the levels to acceptable limits.  If an employee must work in levels above the PEL, OSHA regulations require the use of proper respiratory protection.</p>
<p>Noting many PELs are based on science that is nearly 60 years old and are inadequate to protect today&#8217;s workers, OSHA administrator David Michaels asked for help in identifying chemicals to focus on. &#8220;We must assure the protection of workers currently exposed to well-recognized chemical hazards for which we have an inadequate PEL or no PEL at all,&#8221; Michaels said in a press release.</p>
<p>In the first two years of OSHA&#8217;s existence, the agency established 400 PELs, according to the agency. Since then, OSHA has established PELs for only 29 chemicals, and most PELs have remained unchanged despite NIOSH and consensus organizations strengthening their own recommended exposure limits.</p>
<p>Chemical nominations are being accepted until Aug. 27.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/osha-to-stakeholders-which-pels-should-be-updated-first/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Car is on Fire!</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/vehicle-fires</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/vehicle-fires#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Puffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Safety Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of us are naturally afraid of fire - probably because we know too well what fire can do if it's not controlled. Do you know what to do in the event of a fire involving your vehicle?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of us are naturally afraid of fire &#8211; probably because we know too well what fire can do if it&#8217;s not controlled. Do you know what to do in the event of a fire involving your vehicle?</p>
<p>Regardless of where the fire breaks out, the first order of business is to get the vehicle safely stopped well off the road as quickly as you can.</p>
<p>Quickly call for police and fire department assistance, or get someone to call for you. If there is any danger at all that the cargo might explode, stop all traffic and clear the area for 2,000 feet. Leave the fire fighting to the fire department &#8211; opening cargo doors might result in a dangerous flare-up.</p>
<p>Tire fires are usually the result of extreme heat buildup. If possible use plenty of water, thoroughly dousing the tire to cool it off. If water is not available, use your <a href="http://www.conney.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_-Amerex-ABC-Dry-Chemical-Extinguisher_50001_10102_-1_69450_11370_11367_11367" target="_blank">dry chemical extinguisher</a> or dirt. Be on the alert for the fire starting up again.</p>
<p>Fires in the engine compartment can result from electrical shorts or leaking fuel. Dry chemical is the best possible extinguishing agent. If possible, disconnect one of the battery cables to eliminate the possibility of further electrical involvement.</p>
<p>Auto body fires can usually be easily controlled. If the fire might was caused by a short, disconnect one battery cable. Use <a href="http://www.conney.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_-Amerex-ABC-Dry-Chemical-Extinguisher_50001_10102_-1_69450_11370_11367_11367" target="_blank">dry chemical</a> or water to control the fire. If fire spreads, let the fire department handle it.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s any doubt at all about being able to control the fire, call the emergency services quickly. Especially when fire threatens a fuel tank, don&#8217;t take chances &#8211; stop traffic and clear the area. Vehicles are replaceable &#8211; people are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/vehicle-fires/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety Committees in the U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/safety-committees-in-the-u-s</link>
		<comments>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/safety-committees-in-the-u-s#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tesmer, CSP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Safety Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conneyblog.com/?p=1694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike Canada, OSHA laws don’t require companies to establish health and safety committees at their workplace. However, U.S. companies are also subject to state law and there are at least 14 states that do make safety committees mandatory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:Arial; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink 	{color:blue; 	text-decoration:underline; 	text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed 	{color:purple; 	text-decoration:underline; 	text-underline:single;} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Se</p>
<p--><strong> </strong>Unlike Canada, OSHA laws don’t require companies to establish health and safety committees at their workplace. However, U.S. companies are also subject to state law &#8212; and there are at least 14 states that do make safety committees mandatory.</p>
<p>You would think that all 14 states have “state run occupational safety and health plans” (as opposed to the more common federally run OSHA programs), however, this is not the case.  Some of these states on this list are federally run programs, but do add some stipulations which require additional compliance (such as this issue regarding mandatory safety committees).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.safetyxchange.org/compliance-risk-management/safety-committees" target="_blank">Check out this article and see if your state requires mandatory safety committees.</a> You might be surprised!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conneyblog.com/safety-articles/safety-committees-in-the-u-s/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
